未来的中共第一把手习近平于2月13日至17日正式访美。美国官方把习近平此行定位成“认识之行”（Who is
Xi）.海外媒体则称作“摸底”之行。无论哪种说法，人们真正关心的是，此君若真的掌握了中国的最高权力，对世界将意味着什么？其实习近平当年在墨西哥说
的那番“粗鲁的真话”已传递了他本人以至中共领导集团太多资讯他说：“有些吃饱了没事干的外国人，对我们的事情指手划脚。中国一不输出革命，二不输出饥饿
和贫困，三不去折腾你们，还有什么好说的。” 官方也觉得这话讲得太粗鲁，以至第一时间就加以封杀。
平民出身的著名导演冯小刚，
曾公开吐露自己年轻时对高干子弟的怨恨。原因之一就是高干子弟有讲粗鲁真话的权力，而平民子弟则只能夹着尾巴做人，不许乱说乱动。其实，粗鲁的真话 并不一定惹人反感，真正令人反感的是这些粗鲁的真话背后所体现的强烈的“家天下”意识。即这天下是老子的爹妈打下的，所以老子也就是这个天下的主子。
根据中国家天下的传统，许多主子可以说的话，奴才则不能说。此一古老的潜规则并未随着封建帝制的消失而消失，而是在“党天下”的红色江山下继续发扬光大。最典型的例子，就是著名的刘亚洲中将。
刘亚洲之敢言固然令人赞赏，但倘若其没有太子党的特殊身份，就以他的言论，恐怕此时早已与刘晓波和高智晟为伍了。
习近平墨西哥失言，显示出他的急速窜升让他有点得意忘形，以至暴露了太子党最招人痛恨的一面。习近平坦白而粗鲁的真话，传递给世界的是一个不祥的资讯。其 实，在中共的太子党中，还颇有些象刘亚洲这种愿意接受和认同普世价值观的。但中共的干部选拔制度，使他们难于从中共肮脏的党内政治中脱颖而出。其结果只能 是，中共党内平民子弟中最听话的奴才和高干子弟中最不思进取的庸才获取了最高权力。
问题在于，这些奴才和庸才在维护中共政权时，能把许多无辜的生命变成中共的陪葬品。太子党们继承了他们父辈哪种漠视普通民众生命的野蛮倾向。这种不惜以国 民的生命作为权力博弈筹码的野蛮倾向，集中地体现为“杀二十万人换二十年稳定”这种令人彻骨的冷血算计。有人说，此话出自1989年夏中共决定以武力镇压 示威的学生和市民的前夕，太子党的一次政治聚会，我们无法验证此一说法。
（太子党在军队屠城之前曾有一个聚会，会上有人放言：“杀20万人，换20年稳定”）
但无法否认的事实是，太子党中的许多人认同这句话中所体现的政治准则。
习近平是否也认同这个政治准则？他在墨西哥的那番言论至少让人感到，他没有意愿对中共血腥的历史进行反省，也没有与那种野蛮的政治文化告别的意向。他告诉 那些“吃饱了饭没事干”的外国人，不要过问中国统治者如何对待自己的家奴。如果有一天，中国的老百姓起来反对中共的一党专制，要求实行宪政民主，习近平会 如何呢？他会下令军队开枪吗？习近平墨西哥失言传递了一个重要资讯，他有可能比当今平庸的团派更敢于冒天下之大不韪，发出屠杀同胞的命令。
陈涵涛
民主党美国委员会党员
2012年3月20
What Information Divulged from Xi Jinping’s Indiscreet Remark
The future number one man of the Chinese Communist Party, Xi jinping officially visited America from February 13 to 17. American official called this visit as a “Travel of Cognition” (Who is Xi). The overseas Chinese media called the visit as a “Travel to Know the Real Situation”. Whatever the wording, people really care about is: What Xi will bring for the world if he controls Chinese top authority. Actually, the “rude truth” Xi said in Mexico already divulged too much information of Xi Jinping and the leading group of the Chinese Communist Party. So the speech was already deleted from Chinese official websites long time ago.
Chinese famous director, Feng Xiaogang publicly expressed his envy and hate for senior cadres’ juniors. One reason was senior cadres’ juniors had a freedom to speak rude truths, but common people’s juniors had to pay attention to their words and deeds. Actually, rude truths don’t absolutely cause people’s aversion. The real reason that leads to people’s repugnance is a strong consciousness of “family state” behind the truths”. The senior cadres’ juniors think the country was conquered by their parents, so they’re also the masters of the country.
According to the tradition of Chinese family state, something masters can say but servants can’t say. This ancient hidden rule didn’t followed the abolishment of feudal autocracy to be disappeared, it still exist under red China of “party state”. The obvious example is well known Liu Yazhou. Of course, we admire Liu’s courage for speaking the truths. However, if Liu Yazhou isn’t a “princeling” son of revolutionary hero, he must pay a serious price for expression of his political views.
Xi Jinping’s indiscreet remark showed he got swollen-headed because of rapid promotion and exposed his master’s mentality that incurs people’s hate. Xi Jinping’s plain and rude truth transmitted the world a piece of inauspicious information. Actually, there are still many persons who like Liu Yazhou and have the courage to accept and recognize universal value. However, the dirty party politics can’t let them show up by the party’s selective system. The result is: The obedient servants that are from common people’s juniors and the mediocrities that are from senior cadres’ juniors seize the top power.
The problem is: When the servants and the mediocrities maintain the regime of the Chinese Communist Party, they don’t hesitate to sacrifice a lot of innocent lives as funerary object. “Princeling” sons of revolutionary heroes carry on a savage inclination that ignores average persons’ lives from their parents. The savage inclination embodies in a slogan, “Killing 20,000 people to exchange a twenty-year-stability”-A cold-blooded calculation to the bone. Somebody said this slogan came from a political meeting of “princeling” sons of revolutionary heroes before the Chinese Communist Party decided to use force to suppress the students and the townspeople in summer 1989. We’re not able to test and verify the truth. However, there is no doubt many of “princeling” sons of revolutionary heroes recognize the political norm that embodies from the slogan.
Does Xi Jinping also recognize this political norm? Xi’s Mexican speech showed he didn’t have a wish to introspect the bloody history of the Chinese Communist Party and also didn’t have an intention to waive from the barbarous political culture. He told those foreigners that “eat enough and are bored” not to attend how Chinese ruler treats his own family slaves. How is Xi Jinping going to choose, if Chinese common people ask the Chinese Communist party to finish the one party autocracy and to carry out constitutionalism? Will he order the army to fire? Xi’s Mexican indiscreet remark divulged a piece of important information: He will have more possibility to dare to risk universal condemnation to send out an order to butcher his people that current mediocre ruler.
Hantao Chen
Party member of American Committee of The Democratic Party of China
No comments:
Post a Comment